>>
Home

>>
Upcoming Meetings

>>
Past Meetings

>>
Articles for Meetings

>>
Discussion Board

>>
Suggested Topics

>>
Members

>>
Other Events

>>
Details






Prague Spring - Discussion Board

Author Thread: 911: Government Agencies Ignore Facts in Their Reports
Tyler
911: Government Agencies Ignore Facts in Their Reports
Posted: Friday, August 22, 2008 10:24 PM (EST)

As federal agency declares 'new phenomenon' downed WTC 7, activists cry foul is a terrific example of how if the facts don't fit the official conspiracy theory, a government agency will change or ignore them. The case in this article is that NIST's study ignores the evidence of the presence of Thermite which is used in controlled demolitions.

"Specifically, in Appendix C of its World Trade Center Building Performance Study, FEMA  [emphasis added] claimed:

Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the near-surface microstructure. A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel... The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified.

Yet, no study of the mysterious sulfur or melted steel was included in the NIST report."

What happened to the steel would not occur during a hydrocarbon fire.  So NIST ignored it and the pools of molten steel found at the site.  Otherwise their official explanation of structural damage and hydrocarbon causing the collapse would not fit all of the evidence.

 

Hundreds of similar points can be found in David Ray Griffin’s Debunking 911 Debunking.


Comments:

Author Thread:
Tyler
Video Accounts of Secondary Explosions
Posted: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:12 PM (EST)

While Loose Change Final Cut shows 6 minutes of video testimony of secondary explosions in WTC 1 & 2 beginning at 1:16:19 of the documentary, this youtube clip focuses exclusively on such accounts, providing 10 minutes of footage.

 

In addition, over 118 of 503 FDNY professionals said they heard or experienced secondary explosions at the WTC.  Yet the 911 Commission Report, the NIST Report and Popular Mechanics never mentions any of this testimony.  Why?  Because it doesn’t fit the narrative of the official conspiracy theory, that the crash of hijacked planes and the ensuing fires brought down WTC 1 & 2 at freefall speed.

Tyler
The Contradiction of the Damage to WTC 1 & 2 and the Vaporization of the Plane that Hit the Pentagon
Posted: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:17 PM (EST)
The Official conspiracy theory would have us believe that two jets caused so much damage to the 2 WTC towers that they collapsed at free fall speed despite a building design to absorb a slightly larger impact without collapsing.  More importantly, the same official story expects us to believe another plane only caused a 16 foot hole in the Pentagon with the fire lasting less than 7 minutes and senior official eyewitnesses on the scene claiming they did not see any parts of a plane.  Have you ever seen any evidence of a plane that hit the Pentagon? Does it make sense that the first two planes caused so much damage and the third was just vaporized?






Home   |  Upcoming Meetings   |  Past Meetings   |  Articles for Meetings   |  Discussion Board   |  Suggested Topics   |  Members   |  Other Events   |  Details